习近平与中外记者见面为何再提“全人类共同价值”？******
(中共二十大·观察)习近平与中外记者见面为何再提“全人类共同价值”？
中新社北京10月23日电 题：习近平与中外记者见面为何再提“全人类共同价值”？
中新社记者 张蔚然
10月23日，人民大会堂金色大厅，新一届中共中央政治局常委集体亮相。在这个全球瞩目的场合，面向中外记者，中共中央总书记习近平再提弘扬“全人类共同价值”。
10月23日，刚刚在中国共产党第二十届中央委员会第一次全体会议上当选的中共中央总书记习近平和中共中央政治局常委李强、赵乐际、王沪宁、蔡奇、丁薛祥、李希在北京人民大会堂同中外记者亲切见面。图为习近平发表重要讲话。 中新社记者 盛佳鹏 摄“只要共行天下大道，各国就能够和睦相处、合作共赢，携手创造世界的美好未来。”习近平说。
“全人类共同价值”在中共二十大期间成为高频词。二十大报告呼吁，世界各国弘扬和平、发展、公平、正义、民主、自由的全人类共同价值，促进各国人民相知相亲，共同应对各种全球性挑战。
22日，全人类共同价值被正式写入中国共产党党章，以载入“党内母法”的形式固定下来，成为全党行动的共同遵循。有评论认为其展现了中国共产党的“全球观”和“世界意识”。
习近平在同中外记者见面时再次突出宣示“全人类共同价值”，表明中国共产党未来施政将继续致力于拉紧与世界“命运与共”的纽带，以胸怀天下的情怀致力于人类和平与发展崇高事业。
当今世界多极化和经济全球化面临的动荡因素增多，虽然各国相互联系和影响更密切，但疫情、冲突、通胀等造成的外溢效应持续，饥荒疾病仍在流行，隔阂和对立在一些地方持续加深。
着眼全人类历史发展进程，中国共产党提出和倡导的全人类共同价值，旨在超越地域、民族、肤色等差别，以人类共同利益为交汇点，凝聚不同文明的价值共识。
面对各国间存在的具体利益分歧，全人类共同价值理念呼吁各国以“得其大者可以兼其小”的智慧化解矛盾冲突，做大共同发展的“蛋糕”，增加和平合作的“砝码”在国际关系“天平”上的分量；面对不同人群、地域存在的价值理念分歧，全人类共同价值理念呼吁通过对话和交流，让文明的多样性而非单一性得到更大发展，集“小同”为“大同”，化“不同”为“共同”，增进不同文明的交流互鉴。
尤为值得注意的是，各国由于自身环境、历史、发展历程不同，对制度和道路愿景存在不同看法，这本应是世界多样性图景的一部分，但近年来随着个别国家选择通过诉诸小圈子、提出遏制战略、开展“排他行动”来扩大共同声音的“音量”、共同选择的所谓“辐射范围”，给世界发展增添更多不确定性，一些中小经济规模和体量的国家甚至担忧本国有一天或许不得不“选边站队”。
对于这些“乱象”，中国给出了自己的方案——无论是发起全球发展倡议、全球安全倡议，还是继续推进“一带一路”合作，中国都致力于从各国人民最深刻、最普遍、最现实的共同诉求出发，希望在对话、理解与合作中推进世界的共建共治和共赢共享，而非诉诸小圈子和零和博弈。
今天，通过再次郑重宣示“全人类共同价值”，习近平对“如何看世界、中国怎么办”的问题作出了回答，进一步阐明了中共的“世界观”。
正如他在见面会上所说，“我们将同各国人民一道，弘扬和平、发展、公平、正义、民主、自由的全人类共同价值，维护世界和平、促进世界发展，持续推动构建人类命运共同体。”(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 直播快3地图 |
